newsbot
31.10.2016, 12:11
Автор: Phatcat
<pre style='white-space:pre-wrap;width:81ex'>Fix engineering transporters
so many things wrong here, first, spell 36902 - what***39;s that?
second, spell 23446 is not simply gadgetzan transporter malfunction, it
is directly missed destination, which means we did a 1/2 chance on the
destination before.
23444, 23456, 23457 are all identical (as far as spell.dbc goes at least)
case 23448 not needed, as nothing is supposed to happen when you arrive
at the wrong destination, also spell 23447 maybe was used back in vanilla,
maybe not, so far no proof of it it***39;s use has been found, and videos from
a later period show a behaviour more like the one implemented with this
commit. if an earlier video or some sniff data were to appear, though..
case 23450 now used for arrival, as the description of the spell says</pre>
Подробнее... (https://github.com/cmangos/mangos-wotlk/commit/84f2e1d210f69d6a4ff7cabfcfcb4062bc1a7c69)
<pre style='white-space:pre-wrap;width:81ex'>Fix engineering transporters
so many things wrong here, first, spell 36902 - what***39;s that?
second, spell 23446 is not simply gadgetzan transporter malfunction, it
is directly missed destination, which means we did a 1/2 chance on the
destination before.
23444, 23456, 23457 are all identical (as far as spell.dbc goes at least)
case 23448 not needed, as nothing is supposed to happen when you arrive
at the wrong destination, also spell 23447 maybe was used back in vanilla,
maybe not, so far no proof of it it***39;s use has been found, and videos from
a later period show a behaviour more like the one implemented with this
commit. if an earlier video or some sniff data were to appear, though..
case 23450 now used for arrival, as the description of the spell says</pre>
Подробнее... (https://github.com/cmangos/mangos-wotlk/commit/84f2e1d210f69d6a4ff7cabfcfcb4062bc1a7c69)